ロード中...

Beyond Economy and Religion : Resources and Socio-cosmic Fields in Odisha, India

In anthropology, resources are commonly defined in terms of neo-classical theories of action. In order to widen this anthropological definition, a distinction between two ‘fields' is introduced in this article: the ‘social field' and the ‘cosmic field'. It is argued that both fields m...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
出版年:Religion and society 7(2016), 1, Seite 83-96
第一著者: Hardenberg, Roland (著者, VerfasserIn)
フォーマット: Online Resource 論文
言語:English
出版事項: [2016]
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/religion-and-society/7/1/arrs070106.xml
関連資料:Enthalten in: Religion and society
著者紹介:Roland Hardenberg
その他の書誌記述
要約:In anthropology, resources are commonly defined in terms of neo-classical theories of action. In order to widen this anthropological definition, a distinction between two ‘fields' is introduced in this article: the ‘social field' and the ‘cosmic field'. It is argued that both fields may be completely separate and express a pluralistic configuration of values, or they may form a more or less monistic field. These ideas are applied to a conflict about bauxite-rich mountains in Odisha, India, in which those involved have quite different concepts of resources. It is argued that politicians and mining companies, as well as their national and international opponents, separate and even oppose the social and the cosmic fields on the basis of conflicting values. In contrast, it is argued that for the local people named Dongria Kond, the mining companies endanger a cultural system of exchange and provisioning that maintains an undifferentiated socio-cosmic field based on the value of life-giving ‘wealth'.
ISSN:2150-9301